http://www.martinluitingh.com/blog/index.php http://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/57c91132226d7.pdf

All the High Court Cases About Lawyers

WebMay 27, 2015 · 1. In Australia, an advocate’s immunity from lawsuit was first expressly recognised by the High Court in Giannarelli v Wraith [1988] HCA 52; 169 CLR 543.In that case, the High Court applied the common law principle that both barristers and solicitors are immune from civil liability in professional negligence or contract, in relation to the conduct … WebJun 30, 2015 · Case note: Kenderjian v Lepore [2015] ... (quoting Giannarelli v Wraith [1988] HCA 52; 165 CLR 543 at 560 per Mason CJ) or ‘work intimately connected with’ work in a court (D’Orta-Ekenaike ... foodlyft

Giannarelli v Wraith (1988) 165 CLR 543 - Student Law Notes

WebJul 24, 2016 · Giannarelli established that there is an immunity that extends to " work done out of court which leads to a decision affecting the conduct of the case in court ". D'Orta held that the advocate's immunity from suit under the common law extends to protect a solicitor involved in the conduct of litigation in court. WebSince this was not reasonable in the circumstances, it was open for the jury to conclude guilt based upon the unreasonable explanation and the peculiar knowledge of the accused Remember: Counsel’s duty to the court (in terms of the administration of justice) always outweighs their duty to the client: Giannarelli v Wraith (1988) HCA 52 at [11 ... eldritch horror review